The Trump White House late Tuesday tossed into the middle of ongoing coronavirus relief negotiations a $916 billion proposal that includes one-time $600 stimulus payments in the place of a weekly boost to federal unemployment benefits, a trade-off that Democratic lawmakers and economic analysts immediately rejected as unconscionable.
Offered as Democratic and Republican negotiators are racing to strike a relief deal before yearâ€™s end, the White House plan would provide $40 billion for an extension of federal unemployment programs set to expire on December 26â€”but no increase in weekly benefits, despite the dire state of the economy.
â€œWe gave the biggest help to those who needed it. The Republicans would send one $600 check and thatâ€™s it. This is atrocious.â€
â€”Rep. Don Beyer
The Trump administrationâ€™s unemployment insurance plan, put forth by Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, falls well short of a bipartisan framework that calls for $180 billion in funding to boost unemployment benefits by $300 per week through March.
â€œThe presidentâ€™s proposal starts by cutting the unemployment insurance proposal being discussed by bipartisan members of the House and Senate from $180 billion to $40 billion,â€ House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said in a joint statement. â€œThat is unacceptable.â€
As a substitute for the lack of a weekly unemployment boost, the White House proposed a round of direct stimulus payments amounting to $600 per adult and $600 per child.
By contrast, the $2.2 trillion CARES Act that Congress approved in March sent one-time payments of $1,200 per adult and $500 per child to most U.S. households, on top of a $600-per-week unemployment supplement that proved remarkably successful until Republicans allowed it to lapse at the end of July.
â€œWe gave the biggest help to those who needed it,â€ Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) said of the CARES Act. â€œThe Republicans would send one $600 check and thatâ€™s it. This is atrocious.â€
Andrew Stettner, a senior fellow at The Century Foundation, noted that â€œunemployed workers are going thousands in dollars in debt on paltry benefits.â€
â€œStimulus checks are not a substitute,â€ said Stettner, a sentiment echoed by other analysts.
Republicans are now insisting that we can either do another one-time stimulus check or another temporary boost to unemployment benefits, but not both.
If you ask them why we must choose, they donâ€™t have an answer. Seriously. There is no reason not to do both.
â€” Michael Linden (@MichaelSLinden) December 9, 2020
With hiring slowing sharply as coronavirus infections rise nationwide, economists have warned that failure to approve a weekly unemployment boost would heighten the misery already being felt by tens of millions of people across the U.S. According to recent data, around 20 million Americans are currently receiving some form of unemployment insurance, 26 million are struggling to afford enough food, and 40 million could face eviction in the near future.
â€œThe expiration of vital pandemic unemployment insurance (UI) benefits on December 26 willâ€¯leave 12 million workers without a safety net,â€¯and over four million others will have already exhausted their benefits by this cutoff,â€ Elise Gould, senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute, wrote in a blog post last week. â€œThis spells trouble not only for workers and their families who are desperately trying to keep a roof over their heads and put food on the tableâ€”especially with the eviction moratorium also set to expire on December 31â€”but also for the recovery itself.â€
â€œThe longer Congress waits to act, the more permanent damage will be done to American families and the overall economy.â€
â€”Dr. Mark Paul, Dr. Adam Hersh
In addition to being dramatically less ambitious than the CARES Act, the White Houseâ€™s new proposal and the bipartisan plan embraced as a starting point by Democratic leaders are both a far cry from the kind of bold stimulus that experts say is needed to prevent a prolonged recession and ensure a just recovery.
A paper (pdf) authored by economists Dr. Mark Paul and Dr. Adam Hersh and released Tuesday by the Groundwork Collaborative estimates that â€œCongress needs to provide economic relief of between $3-4.5 trillion in the short-term in order to get American families and businesses working at their full potential.â€
â€œThis would include continuing to expand eligibility for unemployment insurance benefits, renewing the $600 weekly supplemental benefits, providing fiscal aid to offset budgetary pressures on state, local, and tribal governments, renewal and better management of the Paycheck Protection Program for small businesses, and resources to expand Covid testing and tracing and health insurance subsidies, among other measures,â€ the economists wrote.
â€œThe longer Congress waits to act,â€ they warned, â€œthe more permanent damage will be done to American families and the overall economy, and the harder it will be for the U.S. economy to regain prosperity.â€